Let's say an anthropocentric political party appears out of nowhere with a clear and definite agenda for their time in power: Improve the dietary options of all the citizens.
There are two possible approaches: 1) disregard the food market and establish public cuisines that will accommodate the hungry. 2) regulate the food market to viable standards of eating.
why? For a rational human being the answer must be obvious and no explanation should be necessary.
Why why? A political party with a unique agenda cannot fall for the established predatory political parties and their vocabulary. There will be no exploration to the fetishized foreign affairs that politiks enjoy. This is a governmental project for the betterment of the people living in an unobjected area.
The enormous food market will come after us. Imagine what would happen if the party supported the legalization of all D's with government-funded control of the substances and monitoring the users and their dosages. All hell will break loose. When the groundwork has been laid and the idea has been distributed, they can never eradicate it.
The more compromises you make the less your enemies will be. In regards to the context of the menu we envision, it's a menu without harm made to produce it. We are what we consume and we cannot accept to consume any more death from beings that were brought to life only to be slaughtered later on. The man- in the patriarchal sense, of the 21st century, shouldn't be depended on mass-produced farms only trying to make some more profit. This is what you eat man with a gym subscription, weekend hikereer!
I would very much like to live in a world where everything is made with care and grace and when someone will lose the joy in the activity, another will take her place.
No comments:
Post a Comment